Information de reference pour ce titreAccession Number: | 00003446-201907000-00003.
|
Author: | Skoe, Erika 1,2,3; Camera, Sarah 1,2,3; Tufts, Jennifer 1,3
|
Institution: | (1)Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences (2)Connecticut Institute for the Brain and Cognitive Sciences (3)University of Connecticut, Storrs, Connecticut, USA.
|
Title: | |
Source: | Ear & Hearing. 40(4):782-793, July/August 2019.
|
Abstract: | Objective: Although numerous studies have shown that musicians have better speech perception in noise (SPIN) compared to nonmusicians, other studies have not replicated the "musician advantage for SPIN." One factor that has not been adequately addressed in previous studies is how musicians' SPIN is affected by routine exposure to high levels of sound. We hypothesized that such exposure diminishes the musician advantage for SPIN.
Design: Environmental sound levels were measured continuously for 1 week via body-worn noise dosimeters in 56 college students with diverse musical backgrounds and clinically normal pure-tone audiometric averages. SPIN was measured using the Quick Speech in Noise Test (QuickSIN). Multiple linear regression modeling was used to examine how music practice (years of playing a musical instrument) and routine noise exposure predict QuickSIN scores.
Results: Noise exposure and music practice were both significant predictors of QuickSIN, but they had opposing influences, with more years of music practice predicting better QuickSIN scores and greater routine noise exposure predicting worse QuickSIN scores. Moreover, mediation analysis suggests that noise exposure suppresses the relationship between music practice and QuickSIN scores.
Conclusions: Our findings suggest a beneficial relationship between music practice and SPIN that is suppressed by noise exposure.
Copyright (C) 2019 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
|
Author Keywords: | Musicians; Noise exposure; Speech perception in noise.
|
References: | Anaya E. M., Pisoni D. B., Kronenberger W. G. Long-term musical experience and auditory and visual perceptual abilities under adverse conditions. J Acoust Soc Am, 2016). 140, 2074.
Anderson S., White-Schwoch T., Parbery-Clark A., et al. A dynamic auditory-cognitive system supports speech-in-noise perception in older adults. Hear Res, 2013). 300, 18-32.
Baskent D., Gaudrain E. Musician advantage for speech-on-speech perception. J Acoust Soc Am, 2016). 139, EL51-EL56.
Boebinger D., Evans S., Rosen S., et al. Musicians and non-musicians are equally adept at perceiving masked speech. J Acoust Soc Am, 2015). 137, 378-387.
Brochard R., Dufour A., Despres O. Effect of musical expertise on visuospatial abilities: Evidence from reaction times and mental imagery. Brain Cogn, 2004). 54, 103-109.
Cameron S., Glyde H., Dillon H. Listening in Spatialized Noise-Sentences Test (LiSN-S): Normative and retest reliability data for adolescents and adults up to 60 years of age. J Am Acad Audiol, 2011). 22, 697-709.
Chin T., Rickard N.S. The Music USE (MUSE) Questionnaire: An instrument to measure engagement in music. Music Perception, 2012). 29(4): 429-446.
Clayton K. K., Swaminathan J., Yazdanbakhsh A., et al. Executive function, visual attention and the cocktail party problem in musicians and non-musicians. PLoS One, 2016). 11, e0157638.
Coffey E. B. J., Mogilever N. B., Zatorre R. J. Speech-in-noise perception in musicians: A review. Hear Res, 2017). 352, 49-69.
Donai J. J., Jennings M. B. Gaps-in-noise detection and gender identification from noise-vocoded vowel segments: Comparing performance of active musicians to non-musicians. J Acoust Soc Am, 2016). 139, EL128.
Elliott L. L. Verbal auditory closure and the speech perception in noise (SPIN) Test. J Speech Hear Res, 1995). 38, 1363-1376.
Fuller C. D., Galvin J. J. 3rd, Maat B., et al. The musician effect: does it persist under degraded pitch conditions of cochlear implant simulations? Front Neurosci, 2014). 8, 179.
Gordon-Salant S., Fitzgibbons P. J. Selected cognitive factors and speech recognition performance among young and elderly listeners. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 1997). 40, 423-431.
Grose J. H., Buss E., Hall J. W. 3rd. Loud music exposure and cochlear synaptopathy in young adults: Isolated auditory brainstem response effects but no perceptual consequences. Trends Hear, 2017). 21, 2331216517737417.
Guest H., Munro K. J., Prendergast G., et al. Impaired speech perception in noise with a normal audiogram: No evidence for cochlear synaptopathy and no relation to lifetime noise exposure. Hear Res, 2018). 364, 142-151.
Hayes A. F., Scharkow M. The relative trustworthiness of inferential tests of the indirect effect in statistical mediation analysis: does method really matter? Psychol Sci, 2013). 24, 1918-1927.
Hope A. J., Luxon L. M., Bamiou D. E. Effects of chronic noise exposure on speech-in-noise perception in the presence of normal audiometry. J Laryngol Otol, 2013). 127, 233-238.
Jin S. H., Nelson P. B., Schlauch R. S., et al. Hearing conservation program for marching band members: a risk for noise-induced hearing loss? Am J Audiol, 2013). 22, 26-39.
Le Prell C. G., Spankovich C., Lobarinas E., et al. Extended high-frequency thresholds in college students: effects of music player use and other recreational noise. J Am Acad Audiol, 2013). 24, 725-739.
Liberman M. C., Epstein M. J., Cleveland S. S., et al. Toward a differential diagnosis of hidden hearing loss in humans. PLoS One, 2016). 11, e0162726.
MacKinnon D. P., Fairchild A. J., Fritz M. S. Mediation analysis. Annu Rev Psychol, 2007). 58, 593-614.
MacKinnon D. P., Krull J. L., Lockwood C. M. Equivalence of the mediation, confounding and suppression effect. Prev Sci, 2000). 1, 173-181.
Madsen S. M. K., Whiteford K. L., Oxenham A. J. Musicians do not benefit from differences in fundamental frequency when listening to speech in competing speech backgrounds. Sci Rep, 2017). 7, 12624.
Meha-Bettison K., Sharma M., Ibrahim R. K., et al. Enhanced speech perception in noise and cortical auditory evoked potentials in professional musicians. Int J Audiol, 2018). 57, 40-52.
Miller V. L. Noise exposure levels for student musicians. Med Probl Perform Art, 2007). 22, 160-164.
Mohamadkhani G., Nilforoushkhoshk M. H., Zadeh Mohammadi A., et al. Comparison of gap in noise test results in musicians and non-musician controls. Bimonthly Audiology-Tehran University of Medical Sciences, 2010). 19, 33-38.
Moradzadeh L., Blumenthal G., Wiseheart M. Musical training, bilingualism, and executive function: a closer look at task switching and dual-task performance. Cogn Sci, 2015). 39, 992-1020.
Nilsson M., Soli S. D., Sullivan J. A. Development of the Hearing in Noise Test for the measurement of speech reception thresholds in quiet and in noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 1994). 95, 1085-1099.
Niskar A. S., Kieszak S. M., Holmes A. E., et al. Estimated prevalence of noise-induced hearing threshold shifts among children 6 to 19 years of age: the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988-1994, United States. Pediatrics, 2001). 108, 40-43.
Parbery-Clark A., Anderson S., Hittner E., et al. Musical experience strengthens the neural representation of sounds important for communication in middle-aged adults. Front Aging Neurosci, 2012). 4, 30.
Parbery-Clark A., Skoe E., Lam C., et al. Musician enhancement for speech-in-noise. Ear Hear, 2009). 30, 653-661.
Parbery-Clark A., Strait D. L., Anderson S., et al. Musical experience and the aging auditory system: implications for cognitive abilities and hearing speech in noise. PLoS One, 2011). 6, e18082.
Passow S., Westerhausen R., Wartenburger I., et al. Human aging compromises attentional control of auditory perception. Psychol Aging, 2012). 27, 99-105.
Pichora-Fuller M. K. Cognitive aging and auditory information processing. Int J Audiol, 2003). 42(Suppl 2), 2S26-2S32.
Prendergast G., Guest H., Munro K. J., et al. Effects of noise exposure on young adults with normal audiograms I: Electrophysiology. Hear Res, 2017). 344, 68-81.
Rabinowitz P. M. Noise-induced hearing loss. Am Fam Physician, 2000). 61, 2749-56, 2759.
Reetzke R., Lam B. P., Xie Z., et al. Effect of simultaneous bilingualism on speech intelligibility across different masker types, modalities, and signal-to-noise ratios in school-age children. PLoS One, 2016). 11, e0168048.
Rodrigues A. C., Loureiro M. A., Caramelli P. Long-term musical training may improve different forms of visual attention ability. Brain Cogn, 2013). 82, 229-235.
Ruggles D. R., Freyman R. L., Oxenham A. J. Influence of musical training on understanding voiced and whispered speech in noise. PLoS One, 2014). 9, e86980.
Sheft S., Shafiro V., Lorenzi C., et al. Effects of age and hearing loss on the relationship between discrimination of stochastic frequency modulation and speech perception. Ear Hear, 2012). 33, 709-720.
Skoe E., Karayanidi K. Bilingualism and speech understanding in noise: Auditory and linguistic factors. J Am Acad Audiol 2018). doi .
Skoe E., Tufts J. Evidence of noise-induced subclinical hearing loss using auditory brainstem responses and objective measures of noise exposure in humans. Hear Res, 2018). 361, 80-91.
Slater J., Kraus N. The role of rhythm in perceiving speech in noise: a comparison of percussionists, vocalists and non-musicians. Cogn Process, 2016). 17, 79-87.
Sliwinska-Kowalska M., Davis A. Noise-induced hearing loss. Noise Health, 2012). 14, 274-280.
Steinel D. V. Data on Music Education: A National Review of Statistics Describing Education in Music and the Other Arts. 1990). Reston, VA: Music Educators National Conference.
Strait D. L., Parbery-Clark A., Hittner E., et al. Musical training during early childhood enhances the neural encoding of speech in noise. Brain Lang, 2012). 123, 191-201.
Swaminathan J., Mason C. R., Streeter T. M., et al. Musical training, individual differences and the cocktail party problem. Sci Rep, 2015). 5, 11628.
Tufts J. B., Skoe E. Examining the noisy life of the college musician: weeklong noise dosimetry of music and non-music activities. Int J Audiol, 2018). 57(Supp1), S20-S27.
Van Engen K. J., Bradlow A. R. Sentence recognition in native- and foreign-language multi-talker background noise. J Acoust Soc Am, 2007). 121, 519-526.
Washnik N. J., Phillips S. L., Teglas S. Student's music exposure: Full-day personal dose measurements. Noise Health, 2016). 18, 98-103.
Yeend I., Beach E. F., Sharma M., et al. The effects of noise exposure and musical training on suprathreshold auditory processing and speech perception in noise. Hear Res, 2017). 353, 224-236.
Zendel B. R., Alain C. Musicians experience less age-related decline in central auditory processing. Psychol Aging, 2012). 27, 410-417.
|
Language: | English.
|
Document Type: | Research Article.
|
Journal Subset: | Clinical Medicine.
|
ISSN: | 0196-0202
|
NLM Journal Code: | e9g, 8005585
|
DOI Number: | https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0...- ouverture dans une nouvelle fenêtre
|
Annotation(s) | |
|
|