Information de reference pour ce titreAccession Number: | 01445455-201706000-00006.
|
Author: | Kim, Jeong Woo MD 1; Lee, Chang Hee MD, PhD *,1; Kim, Soo Byn BA 2; Park, Bit Na MD 1; Park, Yang Shin MD, PhD 1; Lee, Jongmee MD, PhD 1; Park, Cheol Min MD, PhD 1
|
Institution: | (1) Department of RadiologyKorea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of MedicineSeoul Korea (2)Korea University College of MedicineSeoul South Korea
|
Title: | |
Source: | Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 45(6):1599-1608, June 2017.
|
Author Keywords: | hepatocellular carcinoma; FNH like nodule; magnetic resonance imaging; gadoxetic acid; washout.
|
References: | 1. Bruix J, Sherman M, American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases . Management of hepatocellular carcinoma: an update. Hepatology 2011;53:1020-1022.
2. European Association for Study of Liver; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer . EASL-EORTC clinical practice guidelines: management of hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur J Cancer 2012;48:599-641.
3. American College of Radiology . Liver imaging reporting and data system version 2014. Available at: http://- ouverture dans une nouvelle fenêtre http://www.acr.org/Quality-Safef...- ouverture dans une nouvelle fenêtre. Accessed July 1, 2016.
4. Hope TA, Fowler KJ, Sirlin CB, et al. Hepatobiliary agents and their role in LI-RADS. Abdom Imaging 2015;40:613-625.
5. Kitao A, Matsui O, Yoneda N, et al. Hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma: correlation between biologic features and signal intensity on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR images. Radiology 2012;265:780-789.
6. Narita M, Hatano E, Arizono S, et al. Expression of OATP1B3 determines uptake of Gd-EOB-DTPA in hepatocellular carcinoma. J Gastroenterol 2009;44:793-798.
7. Lee SA, Lee CH, Jung WY, et al. Paradoxical high signal intensity of hepatocellular carcinoma in the hepatobiliary phase of Gd-EOB-DTPA enhanced MRI: initial experience. Magn Reson Imaging 2011;29:83-90.
8. Lee S, Kim SH, Park CK, Kim YS, Lee WJ, Lim HK. Comparison between areas with Gd-EOB-DTPA uptake and without in hepatocellular carcinomas on Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced hepatobiliary-phase MR imaging: pathological correlation. J Magn Reson Imaging 2010;32:719-725.
9. Kitao A, Zen Y, Matsui O, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma: signal intensity at gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR Imaging--correlation with molecular transporters and histopathologic features. Radiology 2010;256:817-826.
10. Quaglia A, Tibballs J, Grasso A, et al. Focal nodular hyperplasia-like areas in cirrhosis. Histopathology 2003;42:14-21.
11. Nakashima O, Kurogi M, Yamaguchi R, et al. Unique hypervascular nodules in alcoholic liver cirrhosis: identical to focal nodular hyperplasia-like nodules? J Hepatol 2004;41:992-998.
12. Libbrecht L, Cassiman D, Verslype C, et al. Clinicopathological features of focal nodular hyperplasia-like nodules in 130 cirrhotic explant livers. Am J Gastroenterol 2006;101:2341-2346.
13. Lee YH, Kim SH, Cho MY, Shim KY, Kim MS. Focal nodular hyperplasia-like nodules in alcoholic liver cirrhosis: radiologic-pathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007;188:W459-W463.
14. Wanless IR, Mawdsley C, Adams R. On the pathogenesis of focal nodular hyperplasia of the liver. Hepatology 1985;5:1194-1200.
15. Kondo F. Benign nodular hepatocellular lesions caused by abnormal hepatic circulation: etiological analysis and introduction of a new concept. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2001;16:1319-1328.
16. Yoneda N, Matsui O, Kitao A, et al. Hepatocyte transporter expression in FNH and FNH-like nodule: correlation with signal intensity on gadoxetic acid enhanced magnetic resonance images. Jpn J Radiol 2012;30:499-508.
17. Suh YJ, Kim MJ, Choi JY, Park YN, Park MS, Kim KW. Differentiation of hepatic hyperintense lesions seen on gadoxetic acid-enhanced hepatobiliary phase MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;197:W44-W52.
18. Marrero JA, Hussain HK, Nghiem HV, Umar R, Fontana RJ, Lok AS. Improving the prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic patients with an arterially-enhancing liver mass. Liver Transpl 2005;11:281-289.
19. Cereser L, Furlan A, Bagatto D, et al. Comparison of portal venous and delayed phases of gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging study of cirrhotic liver for the detection of contrast washout of hypervascular hepatocellular carcinoma. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2010;34:706-711.
20. Joo I, Lee JM, Lee DH, Jeon JH, Han JK, Choi BI. Noninvasive diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI: can hypointensity on the hepatobiliary phase be used as an alternative to washout? Eur Radiol 2015;25:2859-2868.
21. Tateyama A, Fukukura Y, Takumi K, et al. Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging features of hepatic hemangioma compared with enhanced computed tomography. World J Gastroenterol 2012;18:6269-6276.
22. Doo KW, Lee CH, Choi JW, Lee J, Kim KA, Park CM. 'Pseudo washout' sign in high-flow hepatic hemangioma on gadoxetic acid contrast-enhanced MRI mimicking hypervascular tumor. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;193:W490-W496.
23. Park YS, Lee CH, Kim JW, Shin S, Park CM. Differentiation of hepatocellular carcinoma from its various mimickers in liver magnetic resonance imaging: what are the tips when using hepatocyte-specific agents? World J Gastroenterol 2016;22:284-299.
24. Taouli B, Koh DM. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging of the liver. Radiology 2010;254:47-66.
25. Park MJ, Kim YK, Lee MW, et al. Small hepatocellular carcinomas: improved sensitivity by combining gadoxetic acid-enhanced and diffusion-weighted MR imaging patterns. Radiology 2012;264:761-770.
26. Vandecaveye V, De Keyzer F, Verslype C, et al. Diffusion-weighted MRI provides additional value to conventional dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for detection of hepatocellular carcinoma. Eur Radiol 2009;19:2456-2466.
27. Bruegel M, Holzapfel K, Gaa J, et al. Characterization of focal liver lesions by ADC measurements using a respiratory triggered diffusion-weighted single-shot echo-planar MR imaging technique. Eur Radiol 2008;18:477-485.
|
Language: | English.
|
Document Type: | Original Research.
|
Journal Subset: | Clinical Medicine.
|
ISSN: | 1053-1807
|
DOI Number: | https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jmri....- ouverture dans une nouvelle fenêtre
|
Annotation(s) | |
|
|