Information de reference pour ce titreAccession Number: | 00007632-201504010-00015.
|
Author: | Charles, Yann Philippe MD, PhD; Sfeir, Gergi MD; Matter-Parrat, Valerie MD; Sauleau, Erik Andre MD, PhD; Steib, Jean-Paul MD
|
Institution: | (*)Service de Chirurgie du Rachis, and (+)Service de Sante Publique, Hopitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Federation de Medecine Translationnelle (FMTS), Universite de Strasbourg, France.
|
Title: | |
Source: | Spine. 40(7):E419-E427, April 01, 2015.
|
Abstract: | Study Design. Retrospective radiographical analysis of cervical and thoracolumbar sagittal alignment in young adults with idiopathic scoliosis.
Objective. To analyze cervical alignment types, the relationship between cervical and thoracolumbar alignment and the effect of posterior instrumentation.
Summary of Background Data. Thoracic scoliosis with hypokyphosis may decrease cervical lordosis. Additional adaptive positional changes of the mobile cervical segment may exist, because sigmoid cervical patterns are observed. Sagittal alignment of the instrumented thoracolumbar spine may influence cervical alignment.
Methods. Pre- and postoperative full-spine radiographs of 52 patients were analyzed at 8-year average follow-up. Sagittal thoracolumbar measurements were T1 slope, T1-T4 kyphosis, T4-T12 kyphosis, L1-S1 lordosis, pelvic incidence, pelvic tilt, sacral slope, sagittal vertical axis (SVA) C7, and SVA C2. Cervical measurements were C0-C2, C2-C6, C2-C4, C4-C6, and C2-T1 lordosis, chin-brow vertical angle.
Results. Five cervical alignment types were identified: lordotic, hypolordotic, kyphotic, sigmoid with cranial lordosis, and sigmoid with cranial kyphosis. Spinopelvic parameters and global thoracolumbar balance remained unchanged postoperatively. The average C2-C6 lordosis increased by 6.4[degrees] (P < 0.0001). Twenty-seven of the 52 patients changed cervical alignment postoperatively. SVA C2-C7 difference changed in this subgroup (P = 0.0159). In 21 of the 27 patients, SVA changed more than 5 mm at C2 (P = 0.0029), and in 25 of the 27 patients at C7 (P < 0.0001). A correlation existed between T4-T12 kyphosis and L1-S1 lordosis, C2-C4 and L1-S1 lordosis, L1-S1 lordosis, and pelvic tilt. T1-T4 kyphosis and T1 slope correlated with C2-T1 lordosis, but proximal junctional kyphosis was not linked to a specific cervical alignment type.
Conclusion. Postoperative adaptive changes occurred at C7 and C2 by shifting anteriorly or posteriorly, resulting in different radiographical cervical shapes. The amount of lumbar lordosis may influence cervical lordosis, which needs to be considered for surgical correction. Adaptive hip movements may influence thoracolumbar and cervical alignment. The amount of proximal thoracic kyphosis influenced cervical lordosis. Global thoracic hypokyphosis might influence cervical alignment, but it was not evidenced.
Level of Evidence: 4
Copyright (C) 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
|
Author Keywords: | idiopathic scoliosis; cervical sagittal alignment; thoracolumbar alignment; proximal junctional kyphosis; adaptive positional changes.
|
References: | 1. Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Noseda O, et al. The vertical projection of the sum of the ground reactive forces of a standing patient is not the same as the C7 plumb line: a radiographic study of the sagittal alignment of 153 asymptomatic volunteers. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006;31:E320-5.
2. Lafage V, Schwab F, Skalli W, et al. Standing balance and sagittal plane spinal deformity: analysis of spinopelvic and gravity line parameters. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008;33:1572-78.
3. Roussouly P, Labelle H, Rouissi J, et al. Pre- and post-operative sagittal balance in idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison over the ages of two cohorts of 132 adolescents and 52 adults. Eur Spine J 2013;22:S203-15.
4. Hwang S, Samdani A, Tantorski M, et al. Cervical sagittal plane decompensation after surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: an effect imparted by postoperative thoracic hypokyphosis. J Neurosurg Spine 2011;15:491-96.
5. Yu M, Silvestre C, Mouton T, et al. Analysis of the cervical spine sagittal alignment in young idiopathic scoliosis: a morphological classification of 120 cases. Eur Spine J 2013;22:2372-81.
6. Roussouly P, Gollogly S, Berthonnaud E, et al. Classification of the normal variation in the sagittal alignment of the human lumbar spine and pelvis in the standing position. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2005;30:29-34.
7. Le Huec JC, Charosky S, Barrey C, et al. Sagittal imbalance cascade for simple degenerative spine and consequences: algorithm of decision for appropriate treatment. Eur Spine J 2011;20:S699-703.
8. Roussouly P, Nnadi C. Sagittal plane deformity: an overview of interpretation and management. Eur Spine J 2010;19:1824-36.
9. Schwab F, Ungar B, Blondel B, et al. Scoliosis Research Society-Schwab adult spinal deformity classification: a validation study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2012;37:1077-82.
10. Ilharreborde B, Vidal C, Skalli W, et al. Sagittal alignment of the cervical spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated by posteromedial translation. Eur Spine J 2013;22:330-37.
11. Canavese F, Turcot K, De Rosa V, et al. Cervical sagittal alignment variations following posterior spinal fusion and instrumentation for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 2011;20:1141-8.
12. Hilibrand AS, Tannenbaum DA, Graziano GP, et al. The sagittal alignment of the cervical spine in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. J Pediatr Orthop 1995;15:627-32.
13. Park MS, Moon SH, Lee HM, et al. The effect of age on cervical sagittal alignment. Normative data on 100 asymptomatic subjects. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013;38:E458-63.
14. Ames CP, Blondel B, Scheer KJ, et al. Cervical radiographical alignment: comprehensive assessment techniques and potential importance in cervical myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013;38:S149-60.
15. Lenke KH, Betz RR, Harms J, et al. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a new classification to determine extent of spinal arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001;83:1169-81.
16. Steib JP, Dumas R, Mitton D, et al. Surgical correction of scoliosis by in situ contouring: a detorsion analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004;29:193-9.
17. Vialle R, Ilharreborde B, Dauzac C, et al. Intra and inter-observer reliability of determining degree of pelvic incidence in high-grade spondylolisthesis using a computer assisted method. Eur Spine J 2006;15:1449-53.
18. Lee SM, Suk SI, Chung ER. Direct vertebral rotation: a new technique of three-dimensional deformity correction with segmental pedicle screw fixation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2004;29:343-9.
19. Clement JL, Chau E, Kimkpe C, et al. Restoration of thoracic kyphosis by posterior instrumentation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Comparative radiographic analysis of two methods of reduction. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008;33:1579-87.
20. Vallespir GP, Flores JB, Trigueros IS, et al. Vertebral coplanar alignment: a standardized technique for three dimensional correction in scoliosis surgery: technical description and preliminary results in Lenke type 1 curves. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008;33:1588-97.
21. Smith JS, Klineberg E, Schwab F, et al. Change in classification grade by the SRS-Schwab adult spinal deformity classification predicts impact on health-related quality of life measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013;38:1663-71.
22. Schwab F, Blondel B, Bess S, et al. Radiographical spinopelvic parameters and disability in the setting of adult spinal deformity. A prospective multicenter analysis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2013;38:E803-12.
23. Terran J, Schwab F, Shaffrey CI, et al. The SRS-Schwab adult spinal deformity classification: assessment and clinical correlations based on a prospective operative and nonoperative cohort. Neurosurgery 2013;73:559-68.
24. Ohara A, Miyamoto K, Naganawa T, et al. Reliabilities of and correlations among five standard methods of assessing the sagittal alignment of the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2006;22:2585-91.
25. Park JH, Cho CB, Song JH, et al. T1 slope and cervical sagittal alignment on cervical CT radiographs of asymptomatic persons. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 2013;53:356-9.
26. Knott PT, Mardjetko SM, Techy F. The use of T1 sagittal angle in predicting overall sagittal balance of the spine. Spine J 2010;10:994-8.
27. Scherer KJ, Tang JA, Smith JS, et al. Cervical spine alignment, sagittal deformity, and clinical implications: a review. J Neurosurg Spine 2013;19:141-59.
28. Hollenbeck SM, Glattes RC, Asher MA, et al. The prevalence of increased proximal junctional flexion following posterior instrumentation and arthrodesis for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008;33:1675-81.
29. Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. Proximal junctional kyphosis in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis after 3 different types of posterior segmental spinal instrumentation and fusions: incidence and risk factor analysis of 410 cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2007;32:2731-8.
30. Liu T, Hai Y. Sagittal plane analysis of selective posterior thoracic spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a comparison study of all pedicle screw and hybrid instrumentation. J Spinal Disord Tech 2014;27:277-82.
31. Ilharreborde B, Sebag G, Skalli W, et al. Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis treated with posteromedial translation: radiologic evaluation with a 3D low-dose system. Eur Spine J 2013;22:2382-91.
32. Lee SH, Son ES, Seo EM, et al. Factors determining cervical spine sagittal balance in asymptomatic adults: correlation with spinopelvic balance and thoracic inlet alignment [published online ahead of print September 7, 2013]. Spine J doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.06.059.
33. Ha Y, Schwab F, Lafage V, et al. Reciprocal changes in cervical spine alignment after corrective thoracolumbar deformity surgery. Eur Spine J 2014;23:552-9.
|
Language: | English.
|
Document Type: | Deformity.
|
Journal Subset: | Clinical Medicine. Health Professions.
|
ISSN: | 0362-2436
|
NLM Journal Code: | 7610646, uxk, 7610649
|
DOI Number: | https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0...- ouverture dans une nouvelle fenêtre
|
Annotation(s) | |
|
|