Information de reference pour ce titreAccession Number: | 01273116-201501000-00001.
|
Author: | Seron, Pamela MSc, PT; Lanas, Fernando MSc, MD; Rios, Eddy MSc, MD; Bonfill, Xavier PhD, MD; Alonso-Coello, Pablo PhD, MD
|
Institution: | Department of Internal Medicine, Centre of Excellence CIGES, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Araucania, Chile (Ms Seron and Drs Lanas and Rios); Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute (IIB-Sant Pau), Universitat Autonoma de Barcelona, CIBER de Epidemiologia y Salud Publica (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain (Dr Bonfill); and Iberoamerican Cochrane Centre, Biomedical Research Institute (IIB-Sant Pau), Sant Pau Hospital, CIBER de Epidemiologia y Salud Publica (CIBERESP), Barcelona, Spain (Dr Alonso-Coello).
|
Title: | |
Source: | Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation & Prevention. 35(1):1-12, January/February 2015.
|
Abstract: | PURPOSE: To evaluate the quality of clinical guidelines (CGs) for cardiac rehabilitation and to critically appraise exercise-related recommendations.
METHODS: Design: critical review. Data sources: main search engines, databases, clearinghouses, and guideline developers. Study selection: We included evidence-based CGs specific to cardiac rehabilitation with recommendations for the period after diagnosis of myocardial infarction or acute coronary syndrome. Clinical guidelines needed to include an exercise component and at least 1 additional component in the cardiac rehabilitation program. Data extraction and appraisal: We evaluated the quality of GCs, using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation Instrument, second version. Three reviewers independently extracted data, appraised the quality of included CGs, and resolved disagreements by consensus.
RESULTS: Nine guidelines were included. The average scores were 79.84%, 59.88%, 55.56%, 85.18%, 48.92%, and 56.79% for the domains of scope and purpose, stakeholder involvement, rigor of development, clarity and presentation, applicability, and editorial independence, respectively. The majority of guidelines recommended low- to moderate-intensity aerobic and resistance exercises, with moderate variability in the frequency and duration of sessions.
CONCLUSIONS: Clinical guidelines consistently recommended aerobic and resistance exercises. Overall, our critical review showed that the quality of CGs was at least moderate, with the greatest deficiencies being related to applicability and rigor of development domains.
Copyright (C) 2015 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
|
Author Keywords: | cardiac rehabilitation; exercise; clinical guidelines; quality evaluation.
|
References: | 1. Teo K, Chow CK, Vaz M, Rangarajan S, Yusuf S. The Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) study: examining the impact of societal influences on chronic noncommunicable diseases in low-, middle-, and high-income countries. Am Heart J. 2009;158:1-7.
2. World Health Organization. The top 10 causes of death. Fact sheet #310. http://www.who.int/mediacentre/f...- ouverture dans une nouvelle fenêtre. Published June 2011. Updated July 2013. Accessed August 1, 2013.
3. Lloyd-Jones D, Adams RJ, Brown TM, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2010;121:e46-e215.
4. Heran BS, Chen JMH, Ebrahim S, et al. Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation for coronary heart disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(7):CD001800. DOI: 101002/14651858CD001800pub22012.
5. Velasco JA, Cosin J, Maroto JM, et al. [Guidelines of the Spanish Society of Cardiology for cardiovascular disease prevention and cardiac rehabilitation]. Rev Esp Cardiol. 2000;53:1095-1120.
6. Balady GJ, Williams MA, Ades PA, et al. Core components of cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention programs: 2007 update: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Exercise, Cardiac Rehabilitation, and Prevention Committee, the Council on Clinical Cardiology; the Councils on Cardiovascular Nursing, Epidemiology and Prevention, and Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism; and the American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation. Circulation. 2007;(115):2675-2682.
7. Davies EJ, Moxham T, Singh S, et al. Exercise based rehabilitation for heart failure. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(4):CD003331. DOI: 101002/14651858CD003331pub32012.
8. Thomas RJ, King M, Lui K, Oldridge N, Pina IL, Spertus J. AACVPR/ACC/AHA 2007 performance measures on cardiac rehabilitation for referral to and delivery of cardiac rehabilitation/secondary prevention services. Circulation. 2007;116:1611-1642.
9. Institutes of Medicine. Clinical Practice Guidelines: Directions for a New Program. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 1990.
10. Woolf SH, Grol R, Hutchinson A, Eccles M, Grimshaw J. Clinical guidelines: potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines. BMJ. 1999;318(7182):527-530.
11. AGREE Collaboration. Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: the AGREE project. Qual Saf Health Care. 2003;12:18-23.
12. Alonso-Coello P, Irfan A, Sola I. The quality of clinical practice guidelines over the last two decades: a systematic review of guideline appraisal studies. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19:e58.
13. Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, et al. AGREE II: advancing guideline development, reporting and evaluation in health care. CMAJ. 2010;182:E839-E842.
14. Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, et al. Development of the AGREE II, part 1: performance, usefulness and areas for improvement. CMAJ. 2010;182:1045-1052.
15. Brouwers MC, Kho ME, Browman GP, et al. Development of the AGREE II, part 2: assessment of validity of items and tools to support application. CMAJ. 2010;182:E472-E478.
16. NICE Clinical Guideline 48. Secondary Prevention in Primary and Secondary Care for Patients Following a Myocardial Infarction. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. http://www.nice.org.uk/nicemedia...- ouverture dans une nouvelle fenêtre. Published May 2007. Accessed July 1, 2011.
17. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network 57. Cardiac rehabilitation. A national clinical guideline. http://www.sign.ac.uk/pdf/sign57...- ouverture dans une nouvelle fenêtre. Published January 2002. Accessed July 1, 2011.
18. Smith SC, Allen J, Blair SN, et al. AHA/ACC guidelines for secondary prevention for patients with coronary and other atherosclerotic vascular disease: 2006 update. Circulation. 2006;113:2363-2372.
19. Stone JA, Arthur HM. Canadian Guidelines for Cardiac Rehabilitation and Cardiovascular Disease Prevention, Second Edition, 2004: executive summary. Can J Cardiol. 2005;21(suppl D):3D-19D.
20. New Zealand Guidelines Group. Best practice evidence-based guideline. Cardiac rehabilitation. http://www.health.govt.nz/system...- ouverture dans une nouvelle fenêtre. Published August 2002. Accessed July 1, 2011.
21. Kavanagh T, Caprio J, Dafoe W, McCartney N. Cardiac Rehabilitation and Secondary Prevention for the Older Patient. Canada: University of Toronto, University of Alberta, University of Ottawa, McMaster University. http://209.217.127.7/download/co...- ouverture dans une nouvelle fenêtre. Published 2002. Accessed July 1, 2011.
22. Goble A, Worcester M. Best Practice Guidelines for Cardiac Rehabilitation and Secondary Prevention. Victoria, Australia: Department of Human Service Victoria. http://www.health.vic.gov.au/nhp...- ouverture dans une nouvelle fenêtre. Published 1999. Accessed July 1, 2011.
23. Cardiac Rehabilitation Guideline Panel. Cardiac rehabilitation. AHCPR Clinical Practice Guidelines No 17. Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/book...- ouverture dans une nouvelle fenêtre 1995. Accessed July 1, 2011.
24. Woolf SH, Grol R, Hutchinson A, Eccles M, Grimshaw J. Clinical guidelines: potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines. BMJ. 1999;318(7182):527-530.
25. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, et al. GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ. 2008;336(7650):924-926.
26. American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation. Guidelines for Cardiac Rehabilitation and Secondary Prevention Programs. 5th ed.: American Association of Cardiovascular and Pulmonary Rehabilitation; 2013.
|
Language: | English.
|
Document Type: | Scientific Review.
|
Journal Subset: | Nursing. Clinical Medicine. Health Professions. Patient Education.
|
ISSN: | 1932-7501
|
NLM Journal Code: | 101291247
|
DOI Number: | https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/HCR.0...- ouverture dans une nouvelle fenêtre
|
Annotation(s) | |
|
|