Information de reference pour ce titreAccession Number: | 00066944-201204000-00009.
|
Author: | Munoz, Miguel Angel 1 2; Anllo-Vento, Lourdes 3; del Carmen Fernandez, Maria 2; Montoya, Pedro 4; Vila, Jaime 2
|
Institution: | (1)Department of Psychology, University of the Balearic Islands, Mallorca, Spain (2)Department of Psychology, University of Granada, Granada, Spain (3)Department of Psychology and F. Oloriz Institute of Neurosciences, University of Granada (4)Department of Psychology, University of the Balearic Islands
|
Title: | Modulation of the Outcome-Related Negativity Associated With Nicotine Abstinence.[Article]
|
Source: | Experimental & Clinical Psychopharmacology. 20(2):151-160, April 2012.
|
Abstract: | Cue-reactivity studies have shown that when consumers are exposed to a substance-related stimulus, potential tobacco use contributes significantly to craving and motivational drive. Although the motivational response to cues signaling tobacco availability has been widely studied, less is known about physiological reactivity to perceived cigarette availability. The aim of the present study was to examine the outcome-related negativity (ORN) evoked by stimuli that signal potential tobacco use in abstinent and sated smokers. The ORN is an event-related potential (ERP) component that reflects the emotional and motivational aspects of reward processing and is modulated by motivational value of reward. Thirty-two such smokers performed two distinct and comparable versions of a gambling task, under conditions of abstinence and satiation. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) analysis revealed that ORN amplitude was larger in abstinent than satisfied smokers on those trials in which tobacco could be used. Differences were significant at the Fz electrode (p < .01) and approached significance at the Cz (p = .061) and Pz (p = .059) electrodes. Moreover, ORN amplitude predicted subjective indices of desire and positive effects from smoking, but only in the abstinence condition. These findings suggest that perceived cigarette availability might influence physiological reactivity in smokers who are nicotine deprived. They also suggest that the ORN component may be related to the motivational mechanisms involved in addictive behavior.
(C) 2012 by the American Psychological Association
|
Author Keywords: | craving; smoking; ORN; ERP; reward.
|
References: | 1. Anton, R. F. (1999). What is craving? Models and implications for treatment. Alcohol Research & Health, 23, 165-173.
2. Baker, T. B., Brandon, T. H., & Chassin, L. (2004). Motivational influences on cigarette smoking. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 463-491. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142054
3. Brown, T. A., DiNardo, P., & Barlow D. H. (1994). The anxiety disorder interview schedule for DSM-IV. Albany, NY: State University of New York, Center for Stress and Anxiety Disorders.
4. Carter, B. L., & Tiffany, S. T. (1999). Cue-reactivity and the future of addiction research. Addiction, 94, 327-340. doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.1999.9433273.x
5. Cepeda-Benito, A., & Reig-Ferrer, A. (2004). Development of a brief questionnaire of smoking urges-Spanish. Psychological Assessment, 16, 402-407. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.16.4.402
6. Cepeda-Benito, A., & Tiffany, S. T. (1996). The use of a dual-task procedure for the assessment of cognitive effort associated with cigarette craving. Psychopharmacology, 127, 155-163. doi:10.1007/BF02805989
7. Cohen, M. X., Elger, C. E., & Ranganath, C. (2007). Reward expectation modulates feedback-related negativity and EEG spectra. NeuroImage, 35, 968-978. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.11.056
8. Cook, E. W., III. (1994). VPM reference manual. Birmingham, AL: Author.
9. Cox, L. S., Tiffany, S. T., & Christen, A. G. (2001). Evaluation of the brief questionnaire of smoking urges (QSU-brief) in laboratory and clinical settings. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 3, 7-16. doi:10.1080/14622200020032051
10. Davies, G. M., Willner, P., & Morgan, M. J. (2000). Smoking-related cues elicit craving in tobacco "chippers": A replication and validation of the two-factor structure of the Questionnaire of Smoking Urges. Psychopharmacology, 152, 334-342. doi:10.1007/s002130000526
11. Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134, 9-21. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009
12. Dols, M., van den Hout, M., Kindt, M., & Willems, B. (2002). The urge to smoke depends on the expectation of smoking. Addiction, 97, 87-93. doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2002.00010.x
13. Dols, M., Willems, B., van den Hout, M., & Bittoun, R. (2000). Smokers can learn to influence their urge to smoke. Addictive Behaviors, 25, 103-108. doi:10.1016/S0306-4603(98)00115-4
14. Doran, N., McChargue, D., & Spring, B. (2008). Effect of impulsivity on cardiovascular and subjective reactivity to smoking cues. Addictive Behaviors, 33, 167-172. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.05.009
15. Droungas, A., Ehrman, R. N., Childress, A. R., & O'Brien, C. P. (1995). Effect of smoking cues and cigarette availability on craving and smoking behavior. Addictive Behaviors, 20, 657-673. doi:10.1016/0306-4603(95)00029-C
16. Drummond, D. C. (2001). Theories of drug craving, ancient and modern. Addiction, 96, 33-46. doi:10.1046/j.1360-0443.2001.961333.x
17. Fein, G., & Chang, M. (2008). Smaller feedback ERN amplitudes during the BART are associated with a greater family history density of alcohol problems in treatment-naive alcoholics. Drug and Alcohol Dependence, 92, 141-148. doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2007.07.017
18. Field, M., & Duka, T. (2001). Smoking expectancy mediates the conditioned responses to arbitrary smoking cues. Behavioural Pharmacology, 12, 183-194. doi:10.1097/00008877-200105000-00004
19. Field, M., Mogg, K., & Bradley, B. P. (2006). Attention to drug-related cues in drug abuse and addiction: Component processes. In R. Weirs & A. Stacy (), Handbook of implicit cognition and addiction (pp. 151-163). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Franken, I. H. (2003). Drug craving and addiction: Integrating psychological and neuropsychopharmacological approaches. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 27, 563-579. doi:10.1016/S0278-5846(03)00081-2
21. Gehring, W. J., & Willoughby, A. R. (2002). The medial frontal cortex and the rapid processing of monetary gains and losses. Science, 295, 2279-2282. doi:10.1126/science.1066893
22. Glautier, S., & Tiffany, S. T. (1995). Methodological issues in cue reactivity research. In C. Drummond, S. Tiffany, S. Glautier, and R. Remington, Addictive behaviour: Cue exposure theory and practice (pp. 75-97). Oxford, England: Wiley.
23. Gloria, R., Angelos, L., Schaefer, H. S., Davis, J. M., Majeskie, M., Richmond, B. S., . . . Baker, T. B. (2009). An fMRI investigation of the impact of withdrawal on regional brain activity during nicotine anticipation. Psychophysiology, 46, 681-693. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00823.x
24. Goldstein, R. Z., Tomasi, D., Alia-Klein, N., Zhang, L., Telang, F., & Volkow, N. D. (2007). The effect of practice on a sustained attention task in cocaine abusers. NeuroImage, 35, 194-206. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.12.004
62. Heatherton, T. F., Kozlowski, L. T., Frecker, R. C., & Fagerstrom, K. O. (1991). The Fagerstrom test for nicotine dependence: A revision of the Fagerstrom Tolerance Questionnaire. British Journal Addiction, 86, 1119-1127.
25. Heishman, S. J., Singleton, E. G., & Pickworth, W. B. (2008). Reliability and validity of a Short Form of the Tobacco Craving Questionnaire. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 10, 643-651. doi:10.1080/14622200801908174
26. Hogarth, L., Dickinson, A., Hutton, S. B., Bamborough, H., & Duka, T. (2006). Contingency knowledge is necessary for learned motivated behaviour in humans: Relevance for addictive behaviour. Addiction, 101, 1153-1166. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01459.x
27. Holroyd, C. B., & Coles, M. G. H. (2002). The neural basis of human error processing: reinforcement learning, dopamine, and the error-related negativity. Psychological Review, 109, 679-709. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.109.4.679
28. Juliano, L. M., & Brandon, T. H. (1998). Reactivity to instructed smoking availability and environmental cues: Evidence with urge and reaction time. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 6, 45-53. doi:10.1037/1064-1297.6.1.45
29. Kamarajan, C., Porjesz, B., Rangaswamy, M., Tang, Y., Chorlian, D. B., Padmanabhapillai, A., . . . Begleiter, H. (2009). Brain signatures of monetary loss and gain: Outcome-related potentials in a single outcome gambling task. Behavioural Brain Research, 197, 62-76. doi:10.1016/j.bbr.2008.08.011
30. Kamarajan, C., Rangaswamy, M., Chorlian, D. B., Manz, N., Tang, Y., Pandey, A. K., . . . Porjesz, B. (2008). Theta oscillations during the processing of monetary loss and gain: A perspective on gender and impulsivity. Brain Research, 1235, 45-62. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2008.06.051
31. Kamarajan, C., Rangaswamy, M., Tang, Y., Chorlian, D. B., Pandey, A. K., Roopesh, B. N., . . . Porjesz, B. (2010). Dysfunctional reward processing in male alcoholics: An ERP study during a gambling task. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 44, 576-590. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychires.2009.11.019
32. Knowlton, B. J., Squire, L. R., & Gluck, M. A. (1994). Probabilistic classification learning in amnesia. Learning & Memory, 1, 106-120.
33. Laberg, J. C. (1990). What is presented, and what prevented, in cue exposure and response prevention with alcohol dependent subjects? Addictive Behaviors, 15, 367-386. doi:10.1016/0306-4603(90)90046-Z
34. Larowe, S. D., Saladin, M. E., Carpenter, M. J., & Upadhyaya, H. P. (2007). Reactivity to nicotine cues over repeated cue reactivity sessions. Addictive Behaviors, 32, 2888-2899. doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2007.04.025
35. Luu, P., Tucker, D. M., & Makeig, S. (2004). Frontal midline theta and the error-related negativity: Neurophysiological mechanisms of action regulation. Clinical Neurophysiology, 115, 1821-1835. doi:10.1016/j.clinph.2004.03.031
36. Markou, A., Weiss, F., Gold, L., Caine, S., Schulteis, G., & Koob, G. (1993). Animal models of drug craving. Psychopharmacology, 112, 163-182. doi:10.1007/BF02244907
37. Martin-Solch, C., Magyar, S., Kunig, G., Missimer, J., Schultz, W., & Leenders, K. L. (2001). Changes in brain activation associated with reward processing in smokers and nonsmokers. Experimental Brain Research, 139, 278-286. doi:10.1007/s002210100751
38. McBride, D., Barrett, S. P., Kelly, J. T., Aw, A., & Dagher, A. (2006). Effects of expectancy and abstinence on the neural response to smoking cues in cigarette smokers: An fMRI study. Neuropsychopharmacology, 31, 2728-2738. doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1301075
39. McClernon, F. J., Hiott, F. B., Huettel, S. A., & Rose, J. E. (2005). Abstinence-induced changes in self-report craving correlate with event-related FMRI responses to smoking cues. Neuropsychopharmacology, 30, 1940-1947. doi:10.1038/sj.npp.1300780
40. Morgan, M. J., Davies, G. M., & Willner, P. (1999). The Questionnaire of Smoking Urges is sensitive to abstinence and exposure to smoking-related cues. Behavioural Pharmacology, 10, 619-626. doi:10.1097/00008877-199911000-00008
41. Nieuwenhuis, S., Heslenfeld, D. J., Alting von Geusau, N. J., Mars, R. B., Holroyd, C. B., & Yeung, N. (2005). Activity in human reward-sensitive brain areas is strongly context dependent. NeuroImage, 25, 1302-1309. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.043
42. Nieuwenhuis, S., Holroyd, C. B., Mol, N., & Coles, M. G. H. (2004). Reinforcement-related brain potentials from medial frontal cortex: Origins and functional significance. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 28, 441-448. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.05.003
43. Reber, P. J., Knowlton, B. J., & Squire, L. R. (1996). Dissociable properties of memory systems: Differences in the flexibility of declarative and nondeclarative knowledge. Behavioral Neuroscience, 110, 861-871. doi:10.1037/0735-7044.110.5.861
44. Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64-99). New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
45. Robinson, T. E., & Berridge, K. C. (1993). The neural basis of drug craving: An incentive-sensitization theory of addiction. Brain Research Reviews, 18, 247-291. doi:10.1016/0165-0173(93)90013-P
46. Robinson, T. E., & Berridge, K. C. (2004). Incentive-sensitization and drug "wanting." Psychopharmacology, 171, 352-353. doi:10.1007/s00213-003-1602-z
47. Robinson, T. E., & Berridge, K. C. (2008). The incentive sensitization theory of addiction: Some current issues. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363, 3137-3146. doi:10.1098/rstb.2008.0093
48. Sayette, M. A., Loewenstein, G., Kirchner, T. R., & Travis, T. (2005). Effects of smoking urge on temporal cognition. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 19, 88-93. doi:10.1037/0893-164X.19.1.88
49. Sayette, M. A., Shiffman, S., Tiffany, S. T., Niaura, R. S., Martin, C. S., & Shadel, W. G. (2000). The measurement of drug craving. Addiction, 95, S189.
50. Semlitsch, H. V., Anderer, P., Schuster, P., & Presslich, O. (1986). A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts, applied to the P300 ERP. Psychophysiology, 23, 695-703. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8986.1986.tb00696.x
51. Siegel, S. (2005). Drug tolerance, drug addiction, and drug anticipation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 296-300. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00384.x
52. Stoehr, J. D. (2006). The neurobiology of addiction. Philadelphia, PA: Chelsea House.
53. Tiffany, S. T., Carter, B. L., & Singleton, E. G. (2000). Challenges in the manipulation, assessment and interpretation of craving relevant variables. Addiction, 95, S177.
54. Tiffany, S. T., & Drobes, D. J. (1991). The development and initial validation of a questionnaire on smoking urges. British Journal of Addiction, 86, 1467-1476. doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.1991.tb01732.x
55. Wertz, J. M., & Sayette, M. A. (2001a). A review of the effects of perceived drug use opportunity on self-reported urge. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 9, 3-13. doi:10.1037/1064-1297.9.1.3
56. Wertz, J. M., & Sayette, M. A. (2001b). Effects of smoking opportunity on attentional bias in smokers. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 15, 268-271. doi:10.1037/0893-164X.15.3.268
57. Willingham, D. B., Nissen, M. J., & Bullemer, P. (1989). On the development of procedural knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 1047-1060. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.15.6.1047
58. Wilson, S. J., Sayette, M. A., Delgado, M. R., & Fiez, J. A. (2005). Instructed smoking expectancy modulates cue-elicited neural activity: A preliminary study. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 7, 637-645. doi:10.1080/14622200500185520
59. Yeung, N., & Cohen, J. D. (2006). The impact of cognitive deficits on conflict monitoring. Psychological Science, 17, 164-171. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01680.x
60. Yeung, N., & Sanfey, A. G. (2004). Independent coding of reward magnitude and valence in the human brain. The Journal of Neuroscience, 24, 6258-6264. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4537-03.2004
61. Zinser, M. C., Fiore, M. C., Davidson, R. J., & Baker, T. B. (1999). Manipulating smoking motivation: Impact on an electrophysiological index of approach motivation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 108, 240-254. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.108.2.240
|
Language: | English.
|
Document Type: | article.
|
Journal Subset: | Clinical Medicine. Behavioral & Social Sciences. PsycARTICLES. Pharmacology.
|
ISSN: | 1064-1297
|
NLM Journal Code: | cwb
|
DOI Number: | https://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0025...- ouverture dans une nouvelle fenêtre
|
Annotation(s) | |
|
|