Information de reference pour ce titreAccession Number: | 00000539-200710000-00041.
|
Author: | Lentschener, Claude MD *; Tostivint, Patrice *; White, Paul F. PhD +; Gentili, Marc E. PhD ++; Ozier, Yves MD, PhD *
|
Institution: | From the *Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Universite Paris-Descartes, Faculte de Medecine, Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Hopital Cochin, Paris Cedex, France; +Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Management, University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, Texas; and ++Department of Anesthesiology, CHP Saint-Gregoire, Saint-Gregoire, France.
|
Title: | |
Source: | Anesthesia & Analgesia. 105(4):1143-1147, October 2007.
|
Abstract: | BACKGROUND: Sedation can occur during intravenous titration of morphine for acute pain control in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU). We designed this case-control study to evaluate the relationship between opioid-induced sedation in the PACU and adequacy of early postoperative analgesia.
METHODS: Intravenous morphine was titrated in 2 mg (body weight <=60 kg) or 3 mg (body weight >60 kg) boluses every 5 min to treat moderate-to-severe pain in the PACU. Pain was assessed using a 11-point verbal rating scale (VRS) with scores >=3 representing moderate-to-severe pain. The 6-point Ramsay score was used to assess the level of sedation with scores >3 representing clinically significant sedation. Twenty-six patients, with a Ramsay sedation score >3 and a pain VRS >=3 at discharge from the PACU, were evaluated 24 h after surgery to assess (a) the recall of early postoperative pain in the PACU, (b) quality of sleep on the first night after surgery, (c) pain on the 24th postoperative hour, and (d) satisfaction with pain management at 24 h after surgery. Two patients discharged from the PACU with VRS pain scores <3 were matched to each of the patients with pain scores >=3 and Ramsay score >3, as part of a 52 patient control group.
RESULTS: Patients with Ramsay scores >3 and pain scores >=3 more frequently reported moderate-to-severe pain in the PACU (severe/moderate/no pain: 18%/25%/57% vs 58%/16%/26%, P = 0006, for the control and the sedated group, respectively), poorer quality of sleep the night after surgery (well/moderate/bad: 48%/42%/10% vs 23%/23%/54%, P = 0.001, for the control and the sedated group, respectively), and higher pain scores at the 24th hour after surgery (severe/moderate/no pain: 6%/44%/50% vs 50%/42%/8%, P < 0.0001, for the control and the sedated group, respectively). In addition, their overall satisfaction with pain control during the first 24 postoperative hours was lower (satisfied/moderately satisfied/not satisfied: 96%/2%/2% vs 50%/30%/20%, P < 0.0001, for the control and the sedated group, respectively).
CONCLUSION: Clinically significant opioid-induced sedation in the PACU does not insure adequate self-reported pain relief.
(C) 2007 International Anesthesia Research Society
|
References: | 1. Fleron MH, Weiskopf RB, Bertrand M, Mouren S, Eyraud D, Godet G, Riou B, Kieffer E, Coriat P. A comparison of intrathecal opioid and intravenous analgesia for the incidence of cardiovascular, respiratory, and renal complications after abdominal aortic surgery. Anesth Analg 2003;97:2-12
2. Paqueron X, Lumbroso A, Mergoni P, Aubrun F, Langeron O, Coriat P, Riou B. Is morphine-induced sedation synonymous with analgesia during intravenous morphine titration? Br J Anaesth 2002;89:697-701
3. Aubrun F, Hrazdilova O, Langeron O, Coriat P, Riou B. A high initial VAS score and sedation after iv morphine titration are associated with the need for rescue analgesia. Can J Anaesth 2004;51:969-74
4. Aubrun F, Monsel S, Langeron S, Coriat P, Riou B. Postoperative titration of intravenous morphine. Eur J Anaesthesiol 2001; 18:159-65
5. Ustun Y, Gunduz M, Erdogan O, Benlidayi ME. Dexmedetomidine versus midazolam in outpatient third molar surgery. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2006;64:1353-8
6. Jensen MP, Karoly P, Braver S. The measurement of clinical pain intensity: a comparison of six methods. Pain 1986;27:117-26
7. DeLoach LJ, Higgins MS, Caplan AB, Stiff JL. The visual analog scale in the immediate postoperative period: intra subject variability and correlation with a numeric scale. Anesth Analg 1998;86:102-6
8. Terai T, Yukioka H, Asada A. Pain evaluation in the intensive care unit: observer-reported faces scale compared with self-reported visual analog scale. Reg Anesth Pain Med 1998; 23:147-51
9. Kapfer B, Alfonsi P, Guignard B, Sessler DI, Chauvin M, Kapfer B, Alfonsi P, Guignard B, Sessler DI, Chauvin M. Nefopam and ketamine comparably enhance postoperative analgesia. Anesth Analg 2005;100:169-74
10. White PF. The changing role of non-opioid analgesic techniques in the management of postoperative pain. Anesth Analg 2005; 101:S5-22
11. Ramsay MA, Savage TM, Simpson BR, Goodwin R. Controlled sedation with alphaxalone-alphadolone. BMJ 1974;2:656-9
12. Aubrun F, Salvi N, Coriat P, Riou B. Sex- and age-related differences in morphine requirements for postoperative pain relief. Anesthesiology 2005;103:156-60
13. Iselin-Chaves IA, Flaishon R, Sebel PS, Howell S, Gan TJ, Sigl J, Ginsberg B, Glass PS. The effect of the interaction of propofol and alfentanil on recall, loss of consciousness, and the bispectral Index. Anesth Analg 1998;87:949-55
14. Olofsen E, Romberg R, Bijl HM, Mooren R, Englbers F, Kest B, Dahan A. Alfentanil and placebo analgesia: no sex differences detected in models of experimental pain. Anesthesiology 2005; 103:130-9
15. Zalon ML. Nurses'assessment of postoperative patients' pain. Pain 1993;54:329-34
16. Hood DD, Curry R, Eisenach JC. Intravenous remifentanil produces withdrawal hyperalgesia in volunteers with capsaicin-induced hyperalgesia. Anesth Analg 2003;97:810-5
17. Lentschener C, Ghimouz A, Bonnichon P, Pepion C, Ozier Y. Remifentanil-propofol vs. sufentanil-propofol: optimal combinations in clinical anesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2003;47:84-9
18. Kuo CP, Jao SW, Chen KM, Wong CS, Yeh CC, Sheen MJ, Wu CT. Comparison of the effects of thoracic epidural analgesia and IV infusion with lidocaine on cytokine response, postoperative pain and bowel function in patients undergoing colonic surgery. Br J Anaesth 2006;97:640-6
|
Language: | English.
|
Document Type: | Analgesia: Research Report.
|
Journal Subset: | Nursing. Clinical Medicine.
|
ISSN: | 0003-2999
|
NLM Journal Code: | 4r8, 1310650
|
DOI Number: | https://dx.doi.org/10.1213/01.an...- ouverture dans une nouvelle fenêtre
|
Annotation(s) | |
|
|