Information de reference pour ce titreAccession Number: | 00002060-200310001-00009.
|
Author: | Good, David C. MD
|
Institution: | From Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston-Salem, North Carolina.
|
Title: | |
Source: | American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation. 82(10) (Supplement):S50-S57, October 2003.
|
Abstract: | Good DC: Stroke: Promising neurorehabilitation interventions and steps toward testing them. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2003;82(Suppl):S50-S57.
The search for evidence-based treatments has resulted in an exciting new era for neurorehabilitation intervention strategies for stroke. Although stroke rehabilitation research poses many methodologic challenges, evaluation of stroke rehabilitation interventions is clearly moving beyond descriptive and observational studies toward well designed randomized clinical trials. The goals of this article are to summarize issues of trial design for stroke rehabilitation, to discuss promising stroke rehabilitation treatments currently undergoing rigorous evaluation, and to present treatments that may be candidates for randomized clinical trials in the future on the basis of promising preliminary data. Several examples of new developments in neuroscience research that are leading to possible rehabilitation interventions will be discussed. New modalities to evaluate the response of neural networks to rehabilitation interventions are also reviewed.
(C) 2003 Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Inc.
|
Author Keywords: | Stroke Rehabilitation; Randomized Clinical Trials; Rehabilitation Research.
|
References: | 1. Broderick J, Brott T, Kothari R, et al: The greater Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky stroke study: Preliminary first-ever and total incidence rates of stroke among blacks. Stroke 1998; 29: 415-21
2. Williams GR, Jiang JG, Matchar DB, et al: Incidence and occurrence of total (first-ever and recurrent stroke). Stroke 1999; 30: 2523-8
3. Post-Stroke Rehabilitation. Rockville MD, US Department of Health and Human Services, Agency for Health Care Policy and Research Publications, 95-0662, 1995
4. Keith RA: Treatment strength in rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1997; 78: 1298-304
5. Taub E, Miller NE, Novack TA, et al: Technique to improve chronic motor deficit after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993; 74: 347-54
6. Miltner WH, Bauder H, Sommer M, et al: Effects of constraint-induced movement therapy on patients with chronic motor deficits after stroke: A replication. Stroke 1999; 30: 586-92
7. Tangeman PT, Banaitis DA, Williams AK: Rehabilitation of chronic stroke patients: Changes in functional performance. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1990; 71: 876-80
8. Duncan PW, Goldstein LB, Matchar D, et al: Measurement of motor recovery after stroke. Stroke 1992; 23: 1084-9
9. Kelly-Hayes M, Wolf PA, Kase CS, et al: Time course of functional recovery after stroke: The Framingham study. J Neurol Rehabil 1989; 3: 65-70
10. Kelly-Hayes M: Time intervals, survival, and destination: Three crucial variables in stroke outcome research. Stroke 1990; 21 (suppl II): II-24-II-26
11. Skilbeck CE, Wade DT, Hewer RL, et al: Recovery after stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1983; 46: 5-8
12. Jorgensen HS, Nakayama H, Raaschou HO, et al: Functional and neurological outcome of stroke and the relation to stroke severity and type, stroke unit treatment, body temperature, age, and other risk factors: The Copenhagen Stroke Study. Top Stroke Rehabil 2000; 6: 1-19
13. Mayo NE, Korner-Bitensky NA, Becker R: Recovery time of independent function post-stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1991; 70: 5-12
14. Jongbloed L: Prediction of function after stroke: A critical review. Stroke 1986; 17: 765-76
15. Reding MJ, Potes E: Rehabilitation outcomes following initial unilateral hemispheric stroke. Stroke 1988; 19: 1354-8
16. Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Fiedler RC: Discharge outcome after stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 1992; 23: 978-82
17. Wade DT, Skilbeck CE, Hewer RL: Predicting Barthel ADL score at six months after an acute stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1983; 64: 24-8
18. Bohannon RW, Lee N, Maljanian R: Postadmission function best predicts acute hospital outcomes after stroke. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 81: 726-30
19. Wade DT, Skilbeck CE, Wood VA, et al: Stroke: The influence of age upon outcome. Age Aging 1984; 13: 357-62
20. Concato J, Shah N, Horwitz R: Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 1887-92
21. Algra A, van Gijn J: Aspirin at any dose above 30 mg offers only modest protection after cerebral ischemia. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1996; 60: 197-9
22. Hacke W, Brott T, Caplan L, et al: Thrombolysis in acute ischemic stroke: Controlled trials and clinical experience. Neurology 1999; 53 (suppl 4): S3-S14
23. Whyte J: Traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: Are there alternatives to randomized clinical trials? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83: 1320-2
24. Benson K, Hartz AJ: A comparison of observational studies and randomized controlled trials. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 1878-86
25. Wolf SL, LeCraw DI, Barton LA, et al: Forced use of hemiplegic upper extremities to reverse the effect of learned nonuse among chronic stroke and head-injured patients. Exp Neurol 1989; 104: 125-32
26. van der Lee JH, Wagenaar RC, Lankhorst GJ, et al: Forced use of the upper extremity in chronic stroke patients: Results from a single-blinded randomized clinical trial. Stroke 1999; 30: 2369-75
27. Dromerick AW, Edwards DF, Hahn M: Does the application of constraint-induced movement therapy during acute rehabilitation reduce arm impairment after ischemic stroke? Stroke 2000; 32: 2984-8
28. Volpe BT, Krebs HI, Hogan N, et al: A novel approach to stroke rehabilitation: Robot-aided sensorimotor stimulation. Neurology 2000; 54: 1938-44
29. Krebs HI, Volpe BT, Ferraro M, et al: Robot-aided neurorehabilitation from evidence-based to science-based rehabilitation. Top Stroke Rehabil 2002; 8: 54-70
30. Lum P, Reinkensmeyer D, Mahoney R, et al: Robotic devices for movement therapy after stroke: Current status and challenges to clinical acceptance. Top Stroke Rehabil 2002; 8: 40-53
31. Hesse S, Bertelt C, Jahnke MT, et al: Treadmill training with partial body weight support compared with physiotherapy in nonambulatory hemiparetic patients. Stroke 1995; 26: 976-81
32. Visintin M, Barbeau H, Korner-Bitensky N, et al: A new approach to retrain gait in stroke patients through body weight support and treadmill stimulation. Stroke 1998; 29: 1122-8
33. Hesse S: Treadmill training with body weight support in hemiparetic patients: Further research needed. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 1999; 13: 179-81
34. Davies PM: Weight-supported treadmill training. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 1999; 13: 167-169
35. Sullivan KJ, Knowlton BJ, Dobkin BH: Step training with body weight support: Effect of treadmill speed and practice paradigms on poststroke locomotor recovery. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2002; 83: 683-91
36. Mudie MH, Matyas TA: Responses of the densely hemiplegic upper extremity to bilateral training. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2001; 15: 129-40
37. Mudie MH, Matyas TA: Can simultaneous bilateral movement involve the undamaged hemisphere in reconstruction of neural damaged by stroke? Disabil Rehabil 2000; 22: 23-37
38. Ridding MC, Brouwer B, Miles TS, et al: Changes in muscle responses to stimulation of the motor cortex induced by peripheral nerve stimulation in human subjects. Exp Brain Res 2000; 131: 135-43
39. Ridding MC, McKay DR, Thompson PD, et al: Changes in corticomotor representations induced by prolonged peripheral nerve stimulation in humans. Clin Neurophysiol 2001; 112: 1461-9
40. Sisto SA, Forrest GF, Glendinning D: Virtual reality applications for motor rehabilitation after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 2002; 8: 11-23
41. Jack D, Boian R, Merians AS, et al: Virtual reality-enhanced stroke rehabilitation. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 2001; 9: 308-18
42. Feeney DM, Gonzales A, Law WA: Amphetamine, haloperidol and experience interact to affect rate of recovery after motor cortex injury. Science 1982; 217: 855-7
43. Goldstein LB, Davis JN: Post-lesion practice and amphetamine facilitated recovery of beam-walking in the rat. Restorative Neurol Neurosci 1990; 1: 311-4
44. Crisostomo EA, Duncan PW, Probst MA, et al: Evidence that amphetamine with physical therapy promotes recovery of motor function in stroke patients. Ann Neurol 1988; 23: 94-7
45. Walker-Batson D, Smith P, Curtis S, et al: Amphetamine paired with physical therapy accelerates motor recovery after stroke. Stroke 1995; 26: 2254-9
46. Scheidtmann K, Fries W, Muller F, et al: Effect of levodopa in combination with physiotherapy on functional motor recovery after stroke: A prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Lancet 2001; 358: 787-90
47. Grade C, Redford B, Chrostowski J, et al: Methylphenidate in early poststroke recovery: A double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1998; 79: 1047-50
48. Lauer RT, Peckham PH, Kilgore KL: EEG-based control of a hand grasp neuroprosthesis. Neuroreport 1999; 10: 1767-71
49. Wolpaw JR, McFarland DJ, Vaughn TM: Brain-computer interface research at the Wadsworth Center. TEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 2000; 8: 222-226
50. Issacs RE, Weber DJ, Schwartz AB: Work toward real-time control of a cortical neural prothesis. TEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 2000; 8: 196-8
51. Wolpaw JR, Birbaumer N, Heetderks WJ, et al: Brain-computer interface technology: A review of the first international meeting. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng 2000; 8: 164-73
52. Savitz SI, Rosenbaum DM, Dinsmore JH, et al: Cell transplantation for stroke. Ann Neurol 2002; 52: 266-75
53. Cramer SC, Bastings EP: Mapping clinically relevant plasticity after stroke. Neuropharmacology 2000; 39: 842-51
54. Cramer SC, Nelles G, Benson RR, et al: A functional MRI study of subjects recovered from hemiparetic stroke. Stroke 1997; 28: 2518-27
55. Liepert J, Miltner WH, Bauder H, et al: Motor cortex plasticity during constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients. Neurosci Lett 1998; 250: 5-8
56. Liepert J, Bauder H, Wolfgang HR, et al: Treatment-induced cortical reorganization after stroke in humans. Stroke 2000; 31: 1210-6
57. Liepert J, Graef S, Uhde I, et al: Training-induced changes of motor cortex representations in stroke patients. Acta Neurol Scand 2000; 101: 321-6
58. Bastings EP, Greenberg JP, Good DC: Hand motor recovery after stroke: A transcranial magnetic stimulation mapping study of motor output areas and their relation to functional status. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2002; 16: 275-82
59. Traversa R, Cicinelli P, Bassi A, et al: Mapping of motor cortical reorganization after stroke: A brain stimulation study with focal magnetic pulses. Stroke 1997; 28: 110-7
60. Chollet F, Dipiero V, Wise RJ, et al: The functional anatomy of motor recovery after stroke in humans: A study with positron emission tomography. Ann Neurol 1991; 29: 63-71
61. Cao Y, D'Olhaberriague L, Vikingstad EM, et al: Pilot study of functional MRI to assess cerebral activation of motor function after post stroke hemiparesis. Stroke 1998; 29: 112-22
62. Marshall RS, Perera GM, Lazar RM, et al: Evolution of cortical activation during recovery from corticospinal tract infarction. Stroke 2000; 31: 656-61
63. Feydy A, Carlier R, Roby-Brami A, et al: Longitudinal study of motor recovery after stroke: Recruitment and focusing of brain activation. Stroke 2002; 33: 1610-7
64. Wittenberg GF, Bastings EP, Scales C, et al: Evolution of transcranial magnetic stimulation motor maps during recovery after stroke. NeuroImage 2001; 13: S5853
65. Greenberg JP, Williams CB, Wittenberg GF, et al: Serial functional magnetic resonance imaging of upper extremity motor function after stroke. Neurology 2002; 58 (suppl 3): A30
66. Butefisch CM, Davis BC, Sawaki L, et al: Modulation of use-independent plasticity by d-amphetamine. Ann Neurol 2002; 51: 59-68
67. Sawaki L, Cohen LG, Classen J, et al: Enhancement of use-dependent plasticity by d-amphetamine. Neurology 2002; 59: 1262
|
Language: | English.
|
Document Type: | Analysis: Clinical Trials.
|
Journal Subset: | Clinical Medicine.
|
ISSN: | 0894-9115
|
NLM Journal Code: | 8803677, ajo
|
Annotation(s) | |
|
|