Information de reference pour ce titreAccession Number: | 00000447-200205002-00001.
|
Author: | The Nature Management of Labor Pain Symposium Steering Committee:; Caton, Donald MD; Corry, Maureen P. MPH; Frigoletto, Fredric D. MD; Hopkins, David P. MD, MPH; Lieberman, Ellice MD, DrPH; Mayberry, Linda PhD, RN; Rooks, Judith P. CNM, MPH; Rosenfield, Allan MD; Sakala, Carol PhD, MSPH; Simkin, Penny PT; Young, Diony
|
Institution: | New York, NY
|
Title: | |
Source: | American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology. 186(5) (Supplement):S1-S15, May 2002.
|
Abstract: | This report describes the background and process for a rigorous project to improve understanding of labor pain and its management, and summarizes the main results and their implications. Labor pain and methods to relieve it are major concerns of childbearing women, with considerable implications for the course, quality, outcome, and cost of intrapartum care. Although these issues affect many women and families and have major consequences for health care systems, both professional and public discourse reveal considerable uncertainty about many questions, including major areas of disagreement. An evidence-based framework, including commissioned papers prepared according to carefully specified scopes and guidelines for systematic review methods, was used to develop more definitive and authoritative answers to many questions in this field. The papers were presented at an invitational symposium jointly sponsored by the Maternity Center Association and the New York Academy of Medicine, were peer-reviewed, and are published in full in this issue of the journal. The results have implications for policy, practice, research, and the education of both health professionals and childbearing women. (Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:S1-15.)
(C) Mosby-Year Book Inc. 2002. All Rights Reserved.
|
Author Keywords: | Labor pain; labor pain management; intrapartum care; informed consent; evidence-based maternity care.
|
References: | 1. Comparing the old world (before evidence based practice) and the new world (with evidence based practice). BMJ [serial online] 2000 Jan 15 320(7228):[1 screen]. Available at: http://bmj.com/cgi/content/full/...- ouverture dans une nouvelle fenêtre. Accessed on: December 5, 2001.
2. Muir Gray JA. Evidence-based healthcare: how to make health policy and management decisions, 2nd ed. Edinburgh (Scotland): Churchill Livingstone; 2001.
3. Sackett DL, Straus SE, Richardson WS, Rosenberg W, Haynes RB. Evidence-based medicine: how to practice and teach EBM, 2nd ed. Edinburgh (Scotland): Churchill Livingstone; 2000.
4. Egger M, Davey Smith G, Altman DG, editors. Systematic reviews in health care: meta-analysis in context, 2nd ed. London (UK): BMJ Publishing Group; 200l.
5. Sutton AJ, Abrams KR, Jones, DR, Sheldon TA, Song F. Systematic reviews of trials and other studies. Health Technol Assess 1998;2:1-276. Available at: http://www.hta.nhsweb.nhs.uk/- ouverture dans une nouvelle fenêtre.
6. The Cochrane methodology register. In:The Cochrane Library, issue 4. Oxford: Update Software; 2001.
7. Values, principles, and objectives of The Nature and Management of Labor Pain: an evidence-based symposium. Available at: http://www.maternitywise.org/pro...- ouverture dans une nouvelle fenêtre.
8. Clarke M, Oxman AD, editors. Cochrane reviewers' handbook 4.1.4 [updated October 2001]. In:The Cochrane Library, issue 4. Oxford: Update Software; 2001. Available at: http://www.cochrane.org/cochrane...- ouverture dans une nouvelle fenêtre.
9. NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York. Undertaking systematic reviews of research on effectiveness: CRD's guidance for those carrying out or commissioning reviews, 2nd ed. York: CRD; 2001. Available at: http://www.york.ac.uk/inst/crd/r...- ouverture dans une nouvelle fenêtre.
10. Stroup DF, Berlin JA, Morton SC, Olkin I, Williamson GD, Rennie D, et al, for the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) Group. Meta-analysis of observational studies in epidemiology: a proposal for reporting. JAMA 2000;283:2008-12. Available at: http://jama.ama-assn.org/- ouverture dans une nouvelle fenêtre issues/v283n15/toc.html.
11. Moher D, Cook DJ, Eastwood S, Olkin I, Rennie D, Stroup DF, for the QUOROM Group. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Lancet 1999;354:1896-1900. Available at: http://www.thelancet.com/journal...- ouverture dans une nouvelle fenêtre.
12. Sutton AJ, Jones DR, Abrams KR, Sheldon TA, Song F. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis: a structured review of the methodological literature. J Health Serv Res Policy 1999;4:49-55.
13. Cook DJ, Sackett DL, Spitzer WO. Methodologic guidelines for systematic reviews of randomized control trials in health care from the Potsdam Consultation on Meta-Analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 1995;48:167-71.
14. Guidance for preparing a systematic review paper for"The Nature and Management of Labor Pain: An Evidence-based Symposium."Available at: http://www.maternitywise.org/pro...- ouverture dans une nouvelle fenêtre.
15. Available at: http://www.maternitywise.org/pro...- ouverture dans une nouvelle fenêtre.
16. Chalmers, I, editor. The Oxford database of perinatal trials. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1988-92.
17. Chalmers, I, Enkin M, Keirse MJNC, editors. Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth, 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1989.
18. Enkin M, Keirse MJNC, Chalmers I. A guide to effective care in pregnancy and childbirth, 1st ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1989.
19. Chalmers I, Enkin M, Keirse MJNC. Preparing and updating systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials of health care. Milbank Quarterly 1993;71:411-37.
20. Lowe NK. The nature of labor pain. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:S16-24.
21. Caton D. What a blessing she had chloroform: the medical and social response to the pain of childbirth from 1800 to the present. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1999.
22. Caton D, Frolich MA, Euliano TY. Anesthesia for childbirth: controversy and change. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:S25-30.
23. Lieberman E, O'Donoghue C. Unintended effects of epidural analgesia during labor: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:S31-68.
24. Halpern SH, Leighton BL, Ohlsson A, Barrett JFR, Rice A. Effect of epidural vs parenteral opioid analgesia on the progress of labor: a meta-analysis. JAMA 1998;280:2105-10.
25. Leighton BL, Halpern SH. The effects of epidural analgesia on labor, maternal, and neonatal outcomes: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:S69-77.
26. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds DJ, Gavaghan DJ, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials 1996;17:1-12.
27. Thacker SB, Stroup DF. Methods and interpretation in systematic reviews: commentary on two parallel reviews of epidural analgesia during labor. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:S79-80.
28. Hodnett ED. Pain and women's satisfaction with the experience of childbirth: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:S160-72.
29. Mayberry LJ, Clemmens D, De A. Epidural analgesia side effects, co-interventions and care of women during childbirth: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:S81-93.
30. Enkin M, Keirse MJNC, Neilson J, Crowther C, Duley L, Hodnett E, et al. A guide to effective care in pregnancy and childbirth, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000.
31. Hawkins JL, Beaty BR, Gibbs CP. Update on obstetric anesthesia practices in the U.S. [abstract]. Anesthesiology 1999;91:A1060.
32. Bricker L, Lavender T. Parenteral opioids for labor pain relief: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:S94-109.
33. Levitt C, Harvey L, Avard D, Chance G, Kaczorowski J. Survey of routine maternity care and practices in Canadian hospitals. Ottawa: Health Canada and Canadian Institute of ChildHealth; 1995.
34. Chamberlain G, Wraight A, Steer P, editors. Pain and its relief in childbirth: the results of a national survey conducted by the National Birthday Trust. Edinburgh (Scotland): Churchill Livingstone; 1993.
35. Rosen MA. Nitrous oxide for relief of labor pain: a systematic review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:S110-26.
36. Rosen MA. Paracervical block for labor analgesia: a brief historical review. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:S127-30.
37. Simkin P. The birth partner: everything you need to know to help a woman through childbirth, 2nd ed. Boston (MA): Harvard Common Press; 2001.
38. Simkin P, Ancheta R. The labor progress handbook: early interventions to prevent and treat dystocia. Oxford: Blackwell Science; 1999.
39. Simkin P. Simkin's ratings of comfort measures for childbirth. Waco (TX): Childbirth Graphics; 1997.
40. Simkin P. Psychologic and non-pharmacologic techniques for labor pain. In: Bonica JJ, McDonald JS, editors. Principles and practice of obstetric analgesia and anesthesia, 2nd ed. Baltimore (MD): Williams and Wilkins; 1995. p. 715-50.
41. Simkin P. Non-pharmacological methods of pain relief during labour. In: Chalmers, I, Enkin M, Keirse MJNC, editors. Effective care in pregnancy and childbirth, vol 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1989. p. 893-912.
42. Simkin P, O'Hara MA. Nonpharmacologic relief of pain during labor: systematic reviews of five methods. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:S131-59.
43. Hodnett ED. Caregiver support for women during childbirth (Cochrane review). In:The Cochrane Library, issue 4. Oxford: Update Software; 2001.
44. Popovic JR, Hall MJ. 1999 National Hospital Discharge Survey. Advance data from vital and health statistics, No. 319. Hyattsville (MD): National Center for Health Statistics; 2001.
45. Simkin P. Just another day in a woman's life? Women's long-term perceptions of their first birth experience, part I. Birth 1991;18:203-10.
46. Simkin P. Just another day in a woman's life? Women's long-term perceptions of their first birth experience, part II. Birth 1992;19:64-81.
47. Marmor TR, Krol DM. Labor pain management in the United States: understanding patterns and the issue of choice. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2002;186:S173-80.
48. Maternity Center Association. How will I cope with labor pain? Available at: http://www.maternitywise.org/mw/...- ouverture dans une nouvelle fenêtre.
49. Maternity Center Association. Listening to Mothers. Available at: http://www.maternitywise.org/- ouverture dans une nouvelle fenêtre.
|
Language: | English.
|
Document Type: | The Nature and Management of Labor Pain: Peer-Reviewed Papers from an Evidence-Based Symposium.
|
Journal Subset: | Clinical Medicine.
|
ISSN: | 0002-9378
|
NLM Journal Code: | 3ni, 0370476
|
Annotation(s) | |
|
|